Brutus, foolishly enough, let Mark Antony live after assassinating Julius Caesar. Can you explain why Brutus had no lasting effect with the citizens?
And none so poor to do him reverence. Action — said Brutus was an honorable man after giving some real examples showing that what Brutus said of Caesar is not true.
To overshoot is to shoot beyond, or over, the mark. How would you read these words throughout the speech? When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept: If it were so, it was a grievous fault, And grievously hath Caesar answer'd it.
Here, under leave of Brutus and the rest-- For Brutus is an honourable man; So are they all, all honourable men-- Come I to speak in Caesar's funeral.
I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, But here I am to speak what I do know. The Romans burned their dead. Do you see any reasons for having Brutus speak in prose? In popular media[ edit ] The lyrics of Bob Dylan 's "Pay in Blood" on his album Tempest include the line, "I came to praise not to bury.
We should say "has ascended. Belike they had, etc.: To every Roman citizen he gives, To every several man, seventy-five drachmas. He tries to seem to have brought no passion to his deed as assassin.
O masters, if I were disposed to stir Your hearts and minds to mutiny and rage, I should do Brutus wrong, and Cassius wrong, Who, you all know, are honourable men: This was the most unkindest cut of all; …………………………………………………………………………………………………… Which all the while ran blood, great Caesar fell.
Marcus Brutus was not a mind-capturing speaker and was so a simple-tongued fellow.
Describe the Roman mob as you imagine it. Ambition should be made of sterner stuff: The main objective of his speech was to explain the people why he killed Caesar and to convince them.
Ambition should be made of sterner stuff: Probably they had some information of how I had moved, or stirred up, the people. When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept: First Citizen Methinks there is much reason in his sayings.Brutus's and Antony's Speeches in Julius Caesar William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar is a tragic story of the dog and the manger.
After Caesar is killed Mark Antony, a good friend of Caesar, plots to revenge his bloody death.
Brutus and Mark Antony both delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar. How do these speeches relate to the conclusion of the play? Write an essay that compares and contrasts the two speeches and connects them to the resolution of the play.5/5(9).
Julius Caesar: Brutus and Mark In William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, there is a major difference between two of the characters, Brutus and Mark Antony. Brutus was very honorable and Antony was very persuasive. Julius Caesar Please see the bottom of the page for full explanatory notes and helpful resources.
The play, Julius Caesar, examines what gives rhetoric its power by putting Brutus's speech against Mark Antony's. Shakespeare shows Antony's rhetoric. The basic difference between the funeral speeches of Brutus and Antony is that Brutus, characteristically, appeals to reason and logic, while Antony, characteristically, appeals to .Download